Peer Editing Worksheet—Literature Review

Name of Reviewer: Diana Caballero

Qirat Shahid

1. Is the title informative and specific?
   
   Yes

• Are section headings used effectively? Does the organization seem logical?
  
  Yes
  
  
  
  
  
• Does the review synthesize the articles or is it just a summary? Give an example.
  
  The review has summary but there also is a comparing and contrasting. All the articles have in common that Dry Eye symptoms can be reduced with the Mediterranean Diet alongside different solutions as well. Such as exercise or consuming other vitamins.

• Does the introduction move from general to specific and include relevant history and key terms?
  What is the thesis? Is it the main point or finding of the lit review?
  
  yes, the introduction includes the symptoms of dry eyes as well as who is affected the most by it. There is not much history behind it which can be incorporated. The thesis states that the Mediterranean diet helps improve dry eyes symptoms. It is the main finding of the lit review.
  
  
  
  
• Are there many grammar, spelling, or punctuation mistakes? Are “you” and “I” pronouns avoided? List a few examples.
  
  there are some grammatical mistakes such as “specially” and some other words that are misspelled. However, pronouns are avoided.
  
  
  
  
• Are in-text citations (and References page) in correct CSE name-year style?

in-text citations are correct; however, the references page needs some revising